Review of the Fujinon XF18mm f1.4 – A Love Renewed

9 years.

That is how long Fujifilm has waited to provide us the larger aperture sibling of the Fujinon XF18mm f2 , finally allowing the XF18 to join the club of the XF16, XF23, XF35 and XF50mm dual sized aperture pairings.

And I am very glad this day did come, and I am now most humbled to share my real life usage perspectives of the XF18mm f1.4 R LM WR officially announced on 15 April 2021.

Let us start.

My full review kit for the XF18mm f1.4 R LM WR

Background: The XF18mm f2 R announced on Jan 9 2012 was one of the three original X-mount lenses released and you can find my review of it here. Even without weather-resistance and issues with internal dust accumulation, this excellent pancake lens does possess its steady fan base.

Akin to the XF50mm f1.0 (my review of this optical monster is here), when I first picked up rumours of a XF18mm f1.4 in the works, I was pretty excited about testing it and I am very appreciative to receive a review unit from Fujifilm for this review.

at f1.4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Shooting portraits makes up at least 60% of what I shoot, and similar to the XF18mm f2, the XF18mm f1.4’s extremely short minimum focusing distance allows me to go closer for more intimate and impactful portraits. In this case, the madly close minimum focusing distance of 20cm (7.08 inches) works incredibly well to give more creative freedom.

The XF18mm f1.4 is frankly lighter and more compact versus what I expected, it sports a 62mm filter diameter.

To start, the review will comprise 3 main sections.

  1. The XF18mm f1.4 R LM WR – the technicalities,
  2. Four reasons for the XF18mm f1.4 sharing why it is going to be the next hit for the street and environmental portrait photographer,
  3. Conclusion.

Section 1: The Technicalities

Straight off the bat, the name XF18mm f1.4 R LM WR implies that this piece of optics comes with a physical aperture ring (R) , and it’s autofocus is powered by linear motors (LM) that debuted in the XF90mm f2 to ensure fast quiet and accurate auto-focus. No prizes for guessing WR means weather-resistance, a criteria for any lens that is likely to spend a lot of time on the streets.

Like the XF27mm f2.8 II, the XF18mm f1.4 comes with a ‘lock’ for when the aperture ring is set to the ‘auto’ position, ensuring that the aperture ring does not get knocked out of position accidentally. (see image below) One simply depresses the orange button to unlock the aperture ring to move out of Auto-aperture mode.

To the users who loved the short minimum focusing distance of the XF18mm f2, the XF18mm f1.4 focuses as close as 20cm (7.08 inches).

*yes, the XF18mm f1.4 does come bundled with a plastic hood as shown.

I deliberately asked for one of the smallest X-mount bodies, the X-E4 for the review.

The XF18mm f1.4 sports a common sized 62mm filter diameter, comes in at 75.6mm length and weighing in at 370 grams (0.815 pounds). For comparison, the XF16mm f1.4 weighs 375 grams.

There is a lot of glass packed in this piece of excellent optics with 15 elements in 9 groups, including 3 aspherical and 1 ED elements.

But let us be frank, you didn’t come here to find specification tables which you can find on Fujifilm’s website, so now done with the necessary, let us proceed into the next section.

Section 2: Four reasons for the XF18mm f1.4

One. Yes, the larger f1.4 aperture makes a real difference in image rendition.

at f1.6, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Beyond simply a larger maximum aperture, the XF18mm f1.4 is tack sharp and resolves excellent details wide open. I was hard pressed to find any sources of aberration with my review copy and sharpness wise, the older XF18mm f2 is simply unable to match the f1.4 version. Corners on the XF18 f1.4 are also much improved over the XF18mm f2. One simply cannot stop progress.

There is little point in paying for a piece of optics that does not perform well wide-open and the XF18mm f1.4 is an example of an excellent designed optic that ticks off this criteria.

at f1.4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f1.4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Some of my peers will probably taunt me for discussing ‘bokeh‘, but personally I find the out-of-focus regions and transition between focused and off-focus areas very pleasant on the XF18mm f1.4. Maybe with age, I have started to avoid ‘too-busy /chaotic’ bokeh renditions and in this sense the XF18mm f1.4 provides a very pleasant, fine (not harsh) bokeh that lends a nice dimension to the image.

at f1.4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
100% Zoomed in crop of the above sample.

Some may scoff at the difference of 1 stop between f2 and f1.4 but note that optically this translates to double the amount of light available to the sensor, making a real difference in the image quality one may get especially in low light or in situations where we prefer to work with lesser depth of field.

at f1.4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

In low light, especially when it is all about getting the shot, we will want every bit of help available, and in this situation, the 1 stop advantage is a blessing. 

at f1.4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f1.4 at 1/6 seconds handheld – XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

These two shots were all photographed hand-held at 1/6s and 1/8s respectively. The X-E4 does not come equipped with IBIS and I am sure using an X-S10 with its 5-stop IBIS would have easily allowed me to obtain sharper shots at slower shutter speeds. With the XF18mm f2 variant, these two shots would not have been possible for me handheld on the X-E4 as I would have needed even longer exposures to compensate for the smaller maximum aperture.

1/8 seconds handheld – XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Two. The excellent build and weather resistance.

As expected, the XF18mm f1.4’s build is robust, and carries with it all the technological advancements over the last 9 years with better quality materials for the body and most of all, weather-sealing which the XF18mm f2 skips.

Rainy days should not be a reason to stop shooting.

One can argue and I will totally agree that the XF18mm f2 is much more compact, but with a f1.4 aperture, you simply cannot fight the law of physics with size. In fact, one amazing thing is that the XF18mm f1.4 is still relatively compact with its 62mm filter size.

Three. The do-it-all (almost) versatile 28mm focal length.

The iPhone has been ranked as the most popular ‘camera’ on Flickr for years, and the Leica Q and Ricoh GR series have all become cult classics and one of the key common characteristics between these cameras is that they all sport the 28mm focal length and i.m.o the attraction lies in the versatility of the 28mm focal length.

And here I will be most glad to share samples across street photography and architecture.

at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Some may see the 28mm focal length as wide, but it presents the balance between the 35mm and 50mm focal lengths, allowing one to include elements of the background into the story-telling of the image, while allowing me to go much closer to the subject. (I actually find it creepy that some people use telephoto lenses to do street photography but we all have our quirks)

at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

The 28mm focal length is easygoing for streets as it is for travel, group photos, architecture and yes, portraits as shown above.

at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f2.8, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Four. Significantly improved autofocus reliability and performance.

The XF18mm f1.4 focuses fast, easily out-performing the XF18mm f2 which still hunts in low light. In street photography, this easily makes the differences between nailing a moment or missing it. The previous XF18mm f2 version though stealthy was hardly a winner in focusing reliability for street snaps.

at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Fast focusing doesn’t matter as much as focusing reliability and the XF18mm f1.4 does great in this respect.

at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

The LM designation in the name defines the use of a linear motor seen from the XF90mm f2 onwards and which has seen reliable performance in many lenses then. Fujifilm claims autofocus speeds to be as fast as 0.04 seconds. But to me, frankly I don’t know how to appreciate the difference between 0.04 and say, 0.10 seconds. If a lens works well, it works well and in the autofocus aspect, the XF18mm f1.4 performs as well as any modern Fujifilm lens should.

at f1.4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)
at f1.4, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Section 3: Concluding words

Understandably, a lot of users will tend to compare the two XF18mm versions and I am guilty of this too. But I am keen to highlight my opinion that the XF18mm f1.4 does not seek to replace the XF18mm f2. After all, few lenses can even compete with the compactness of the classical XF18mm f2. 

Other than sharing the same focal length, frankly I see the two lenses as very different lenses designed to cater to more choices for the photographer, akin to comparing the XF50mm f2 and XF50mm f1.

The XF18mm f2 is a lens I love but it is more of a make-do lens, a lens which may be competitive in a few areas but not extraordinary in sharpness nor aperture.

Unlike the XF27 II which was more of adopting minor but meaningful upgrades to the original (optical formulae remains the same) the XF18mm f1.4 is a totally different lens from the XF18mm f2 redesigned ground up.

The XF18mm f1.4 seeks to provide a strong alternative for the street photographers, users who are clear on their penchant for a 28mm focal length and on their need for the extra stop of speed in their work. Like the photographers who will choose the XF50mm f1 over the XF56mm f1.2 or XF50mm f2, the XF18mm f1.4 will be part of many photographers and enthusiast kits.

at f16, XF18/1.4 on the X-E4 – Classic Chrome (edited)

Thank you for dropping by and reading, do take care.

I will be glad to take any questions in the comments below too.


1. The Fujifilm X-E4 and XF18mm f1.4 were loaned from Fujifilm Asia Pacific and returned.
My thanks and appreciation to Mr. Keitaro So, Divisional Head of Fujifilm for providing the loan.
2. The X-E4 and XF18mm f1.4 were pre-production sets running firmware 1.0.
3. All samples shared were from RAW and edited to my preferences.

25 Replies to “Review of the Fujinon XF18mm f1.4 – A Love Renewed”

  1. Lovely review Keith, especially how you showed how the 18/1.4 works well across the different genres.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks, Keith, for another thoughtful and insightful review. You make it difficult for me to save money😬. And I have been using wider lens without remorse!


    1. Hi! Haha, I feel probably a question that might disturb a few is 16/1.4 vs 18/1.4. Both are great lenses with the 16/1.4 excellent for environmental portraits in the right hands. Personally my preferred focal length is still 28mm as unlike the better wide angle users I’ve difficulties visualing wide shots.


  3. Very sweet looking daughter. Great review like the photos.old man shot walking away is compelling.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Hi Keith,

    I was commenting on your other post deciding between the 23mm f2 and 18mm f2.

    I didn’t realise this has come out, making my decision a whole lot more difficult!
    Not nice for the wallet either haha


    1. 😂 the 18/1.4 is a league ahead of the 23/2 and a big step ahead of the 18/2 in performance though. It’s a nice lens but i wouldn’t say it’s as portable as the 23/2 and 18/2 for sure and more of a specialized lens imo heh heh


  5. Hi Keith, I was looking for an review of the XF18/1.4 and found your review. Lovely writeup you have here.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Great review Keith. How did you find the handling of this lens on the X-E4? Did you need to use the grip and thumb rest? I’m thinking of picking up this lens and the X-E4 for street and travel photography but would rather not add the grip.


    1. Hi Nick, it does have to go back to the lens you choose to use mostly. With the XF27 or XF18/2 there is hardly a need for the grip/ thumb rest.

      Once you go beyond the F2 lenses I’ll say u will appreciate having either the grip or the thumb rest and you are right , I’ll try not to use them as it takes away the compactness the X-E4 is really great for.


  7. Hi Keith,

    Thank you very much for the detailed review!

    Trying to pick between this and the 33 1.4.

    Can only get one prime lens into the setup thus far, maybe later on go for a 16 1.4 or the 10-24.

    Any advice would be welcome!


    1. Hi 🙂 thank you for dropping by.

      The 33 and 18 are quite different in focal lengths , around an approx 50mm vs 28mm and I feel that’s a good start to decided between them based on your shooting needs.

      Optically and performance wise they actually belong to the same generation of X-mount lenses where WR, AF speed and resolution is made for the higher megapixel next generation sensors so the longevity and support is there for years ahead


      1. Yes maybe the 23 1.4 is the best choice in these new lenses!

        But I wont have an opportunity to buy when it comes out in Feb at list price since they have a huge markup where I live, but since one of my friends is returning from Canada I can get the 33 1.4/18 1.4 for list price so I thought I’ll go for one of those focal lengths.

        I shoot mostly pictures of dogs, portraits and landscapes so far, but I have the 18-55 kit so maybe going for prime in the middle is a good idea and I can go wider or closer with the kit lens when I absolutely require it.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. The 18-55 is still one of the best kit lenses I have seen and ya , worth considering if u work well with zooms, I forgot about the new 24/1.4 II until u mentioned it too. I find it a tad pricey too but ya, it will be the most versatile daily lens for me amongst the 18, 33 and 23 F1.4s

        All the best to your choices 🙂


  8. Thanks for your thoughts Keith.

    Take care and stay safe!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s