Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 Lens Review: Impressive Performance and Value

Introduction

The Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 lens was not the lens release we were expecting, but actually glad to have. This is especially so after the heavyweight Nikkor Z 85mm ƒ1.2 and Nikkor Z 135mm ƒ2 Plena releases in the prime lens category and rumour mills predicting an S-line 35mm ƒ1.2 instead.

Nikon says that the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 lens is Nikon’s answer to professional photographers and enthusiasts seeking quality performance in a classic focal length at a most wallet-friendly price. Let us take a deeper look.

*this is part 1 of a 2 parts review of the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4. Look forward to part 2!

A common question, I will also touch on the key differences between the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 and Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S.

tl:dr

While the USD599.95 price tag of the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 was a pleasant surprise to me given how inflation (and greed) has wreaked havoc on camera equipment prices, the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 lens with its versatile focal length and fast ƒ1.4 speed in a relatively compact size has quickly allowed it to become an essential part of my kit, proving its worth across various shooting scenarios. This lens has an extremely good price-performance ratio.

In addition to the focus ring, the multifunction ring also gives this lens a step up from the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S, providing easier access to different functions.

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

In fact, while the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 does not come with the ‘S’ designation, it stands as a very interesting and attractive alternative to the USD849.95 Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S.

The Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 and Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S have differences in their build and character of their image output, and the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 is my choice.

Kudos to Nikon, it has been a while since users read about the price of a new release and go “seriously, so affordable?”

Technicalities

  • Full frame for Z-mount, autofocus.
  • 11 elements in 9 groups with 2 aspherical elements optical design
  • 9-bladed diaphragm design
  • 0.27 meters minimum focusing distance
  • 62mm filter size
  • Maximum reproduction ratio: 0.18x
  • Weather and dust-sealed
  • 74.5 mm (3 in) x 88.5mm (3.5 in), at 415 grams (14.7 oz)
If you wish to count the blades yourself 😀

Build Quality and Handling

I don’t know if this matters to you, but I am a firm supporter of lenses that are internally focusing due to an illogical OCD that lenses with external focusing have a tendency to accumulate moisture and dirt with use. And, yes, the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 is internally focusing.

The Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 feels sturdy and minimalist in design on hand. In fact, there is not even an MF/AF switch on the lens except a comfortably sized focus ring offering just the right amount of resistance to allow precise manual focusing and a thinner control ring on the side nearer to the camera body.

As expected, the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 is weather and dust resistant and comes bundled with the HB-115 hood.

Ergonomically, I recommend using a grip for the Nikon Zf when using the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 while this lens will be very comfortable and balanced to work with on the Z6 Z7 Z8 Z9 variants due to their deeper grips.

Optical Performance

The optical design, featuring 11 elements in 9 groups including 2 aspherical elements, delivers outstanding image quality. Sharpness is impressive even at ƒ1.4, though I must say that the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S has a slight advantage here in contrast and sharpness. Stopping down to ƒ2.8 onwards gives one impressive sharpness across the frame.

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

Chromatic aberration is well-controlled, with only minor fringing in high-contrast scenes at ƒ1.4. Vignetting is present wide open but easily correctable in post-processing.

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

The 9-blade diaphragm produces beautifully round bokeh, especially noticeable in out-of-focus highlights. When shooting wide open, the lens creates a beautiful, soft bokeh that smoothly transitions from the in-focus to out-of-focus areas, ideal for environmental portraits.

For portraits, I prefer the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4’s output as compared to the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S’s (more on this later)

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

The colors rendered by this lens are vibrant and true to life, with a pleasing contrast that enhances the overall image.

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

Practical Use and auto-focus

A 35mm focal length goes together with the 50mm focal length for the most practical prime lens focal lengths. The Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 makes a very versatile lens for street photography, environmental portraits, and capturing everyday moments. An example of a more specialized lens I wouldn’t use daily would probably be the Nikkor Plena.

I tested the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on the Zf, which only means autofocus performance should be even better on the Z6 III, Z8, and Z9 bodies. The autofocus is reliable, fast, and pretty much silent. It locks onto subjects quickly and accurately, even in low-light conditions, making it a good choice for stills and video work.

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

In fact, I realise I have cut down on the habit of taking multiple shots of the same scene due to this fear of an unreliable green autofocus box ever since I moved into the Nikon system.

A helpful tool is the manual focus override, which you activate by simply turning the dedicated focus ring. The focus ring allows for very precise manual focus when turned slowly, and this function is extremely useful for focusing near objects, as I have experienced with it.

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

The Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 has a slim multi-function control ring that can be assigned to operate the aperture (which is the default), exposure compensation, or ISO sensitivity. Whether one uses this, it is still good to have, as on the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S, one must sacrifice the focus ring to map the ring to any other functions.

As mentioned above, weather-resistant construction allows one to shoot in challenging environments with peace of mind.

Versus the Nikkor 35mm F1.8 S

A persistent question for some photographers will be, “With the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4, should I consider the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S, and why is the latter more costly when it is slower by a tad?”

There are differences due to the ‘S-lens’ designation that the ƒ1.8 has and the ƒ1.4 doesn’t, and that is probably primarily seen in how the lenses perform wide open and the build.

However the real question will be: “for us, does this matter or even, is one even able to discern the differences optically wise?”

LEFT: Nikkor 35mm ƒ1.4 (wide open at ƒ1.4) , RIGHT: Nikkor 35mm ƒ1.8 S (wide open at ƒ1.8)
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf
Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

These two lenses are in the category of high-performing lenses hence we are probably deciding between very good and excellent here but the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S does exhibit a higher level of sharpness and contrast out of the camera with a more ‘modern’ look while the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 is very slightly softer and gives a more ‘vintage’ drawing, with a slight glow wide open which I find it personally more suitable for portraits.

The Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4’s output reminds me of an excellent vintage lens with character while the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S is more for those who prefer a sharp, contrasty, clean modern look.

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

At maximum aperture, the charts say that the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 is definitively softer than the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S. It also seems more straightforward to produce flaring on the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 compared to the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S.

Build-wise, the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 body is entirely made of robust quality plastic, while the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S is constructed from a combination of metal and plastics. Another key difference I am not keen to test is that the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 is weather-resistant, while the Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.8 S goes a notch higher, fully weather-sealed.

Shot from my upcoming Part II review

Conclusion

The Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 is a praiseworthy addition to Nikon’s Z-mount lineup. It combines robust build quality with excellent optical performance at an affordable price. Whether you’re shooting portraits, landscapes, or street scenes, this lens delivers optically vibrant images with beautiful bokeh and minimal aberrations.

What is most lovely is there are real differences between the Z 35mm F1.4 and Z 35mm F1.8 S, allowing one to make the choice based on one’s shooting preferences.

The Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 is one release that embodies Nikon’s commitment to quality and innovation, offering a lens that not only meets but exceeds expectations and it is easy to recommend that everyone should try this lens.

Or are you waiting for the rumored Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.2 S?

Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 on Nikon Zf

Disclaimers:

  1. I photographed all product photos and samples here. I believe any reviewer with pride should produce their own product photos. 

2. All images were shot with the Nikon Zf and Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4; the Zf is my personal set, and the lens, a loan from Nikon Singapore, was returned at the end of the review period.

3. This review is not sponsored; I write as a passion and hobby, and I appreciate that photography brands are kind enough to respect and work with me.

4. The best way to support me is to share the review, or you can always help support the site by contributing to my fees to WordPress using the PayPal button at the bottom of the page.

16 Replies to “Nikkor Z 35mm ƒ1.4 Lens Review: Impressive Performance and Value”

  1. Unknown's avatar

    Bravo Keith! I love how clearly the differences between the F1.8 and F1.4 were done.

    Like

    1. Keith Wee's avatar

      Thank you for popping by and for the kind words. The F1.8S is really an excellent lens and great that the F1.4 is different enough.

      Like

  2. Unknown's avatar

    As always, nicely written. I am looking forward to using this lens too.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar

    Hi Keith, thank you. Do you think there will be a Amount 35mm F1.2 S?

    Like

    1. Keith Wee's avatar

      Hi! I’m guessing you meant Z mount 🙂 I can’t say much there’s no official announcement but ‘good things come to the patient one’ is probably the most I can say

      Like

  4. Scott Fillmer's avatar

    Great review of an interesting lens… I’ve got the 1.8S so I wasn’t really looking at this lens but I still find it interesting, it seems to render differently from the 1.8S enough to be very intriguing.

    Like

    1. Keith Wee's avatar

      Hi Scott, thank you for popping by. Yeap, my initial take before the review that the two would be too similar was quite off the mark.

      Like

  5. Michael Williams's avatar

    great review! i enjoyed reading this post as a change from watching youtube video reviews. the bokeh looks great and the tonality of the stopped down images is rendered beautifully (i.e. green swing supports). these new z lenses are incredible pieces of optical engineering. Mike

    Like

      1. Unknown's avatar

        Hi Keith, I really appreciate your reviews, they are a great help. I have the nikkor 40f2 SE and I was wondering if this 35 is sharper and if its rendering is in the style of the 40, since I’m happy with the look of the 40 but it falls short in sharpness.

        Thank you Keith

        Like

      2. Keith Wee's avatar

        Actually the Z40 will not be as sharp as a S lens, like the Z35/1.8 S. The Z35/1.4 is sharp enough but probably because of the much better quality bokeh / separation versus the Z40 will give off the impression better output.

        Like

    1. Unknown's avatar

      Hi Keith, thank you for your review, you are always very helpful. I have the 40f2 SE, I don’t know if you’ve tried them, does this lens look like 40 in its rendering? In terms of sharpness, the 40 falls short for me. Is the 35 sharper?

      Thank you!!

      Like

      1. Keith Wee's avatar

        Hi good day 🙂 the rendering from the 40 is more modern and slightly sharper, with much ‘smaller’ bokeh balls in comparison to this 35 which has a more classical presentation with slightly lesser saturated colors too.

        Like

Leave a reply to Keith Wee Cancel reply