Brightin Star XSlim 28mm F2.8 review – a true pancake lens with character to match

Introduction

Once in a while, a lens that piques my interest (or curiosity) appears, and on paper, the Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8 for Leica M-mount is one such lens. And so, of course, I went for it when the opportunity to test one arose.

Also, there seems to be a 6% discount if you use the code KEITHWEE at Brightin Star shop here.

There are a few qualities that make for an excellent Leica M-mount lens: the build, handling, compactness and of course image quality potential.

To start, the packaging impresses. It’s not ostentatious and very tastefully done.

The concept of pancake lenses has of course, been explored by MS Optics for a while, but I have always found the build and consistency wanting, and thus see them more of a creative novelty, so let us take a look further at how the XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8 holds up.

tl:dr

Brightin Star, the manufacturer, has a good deal of experience designing pancake lenses. Still, they were always more towards the ƒ8 maximum aperture designs, and this time, the XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8 pleasantly surprised me with what the lens can do despite its almost impossibly thin design.

No longer a “set at ƒ8 and shoot” lens but actually very decent optical performance even wide open at ƒ2.8 with a well-thought-out handling and attractive black paint over brass build, photographers will likely like the Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8. At a fraction of the price of an MS-Optics lens, but with better build and image quality potential, I am definitely popping this lens into my everyday carry pouch.

Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8

Design & build

Designed to go with Leica M rangefinders, I can see that Brightin Star has pulled out all the stops versus the standard, primarily plastic designs I often see for some of these pancake lenses.

Constructed out of brass, finished in glossy black paint, and most of all, rangefinder coupled, the design team has really ticked all the boxes.

A quick glance at TTArtisan, 7Artisans and others who still push out non rangefinder coupled designs.

Externally, this lens does remind me a lot of the approximately USD1000 MS-Optics 28mm ƒ2 Apoquealia. However, these two lenses are quite different from the materials and, of course, the optics side.

First, the lens is ‘good hefty’, even for how thin it is at 125 grams (4.4 oz), and it is the type of heft I associate with a good build. (like how a Swatch X Blancpain versus a proper legitimate Blancpain feels in the hand)

Made from brass and finished with what feels like glossy black paint, the entire body is only 9.9 mm (0.39 in) thick and comes in at 51.4 ⌀ × 21.5 mm (2.02 ⌀ x 0.85 in)

The optical design of this 9.9mm thick lens is an impressive six elements in 5 groups and 10 aperture blades going from ƒ2.8 to ƒ16.

The lens features markings in both feet and meters, with the latter marked for zone focusing. The minimum focusing distance is 0.7 meters (2.3 feet) and is rangefinder coupled.

Handling

Handling the XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8 was easier than I had thought, and my worries about managing focusing and aperture changes vanished within the first 10 minutes.

Focusing on this lens is intuitive, using the small focusing tab on the lens itself. The focusing tab comes along with a good amount of smooth resistance. To change the aperture value, one simply shifts the aperture ring to the desired value but do take note, you do need to bring the camera up to check for the aperture value because this lens is a lens cap level thin.

With the lens cap attached

The Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8 comes with a solid metal screw-on front lens cap, which I do not use because I will surely lose it. Instead, I recommend you pick up a 22.5mm UV filter for the lens.

Image quality

Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8

Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8
Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8
Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8

First, the Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8 impressed me with its image quality. Images sharp ƒ8 is hardly worth shouting about, but the images were sharp at wide open without any noticeable loss of details even when on my 40 megapixels M10-R.

Tack sharp at center wide open, with some field curvature and an interesting flare character coupled with saturated colour reproduction makes this lens really worth considering.

A lens design of this thickness is supposed to have some drawbacks somewhere, and field curvature is present in the corners. In my honest opinion, this is to be expected, and one can simply crop in if this matters since the Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8 is tack sharp at the center.

Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8
Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8
Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8

There is some vignetting at ƒ2.8, which drops significantly once we reach ƒ5.6. Hardly an issue and there are times when I simply set the lens to ƒ8 and zone focus on my walkabouts with it.

Bokeh (or the out-of-focus rendering) is pleasant without being distracting. The more interesting character is how the lens can flare if one coax it to (I shot directly into light), making some good room for creative shots versus the clinically boring modern lenses.

Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8
Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8

Another surprise was that chromatic aberrations are pretty well controlled; purple fringing is a non-issue, while some may find some green fringing at the out-of-focus areas.

Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8

Conclusion

To conclude, one must consider what we expect from the Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8. Personally, the reproduction details in this lens are plenty sharp with beautiful sunstars. As mentioned, the images are nicely saturated and tack sharp in the center, even at wide open. In fact, it’s sharper than probably the ones from MS Optics, but this is just my gut feeling.

Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8

Flare resistance is decent, with room for some creative work. If one is good with the amounts of field curvature I think this lens is going to be a very good choice for you, especially when one considers the sheer tiny size of it (I am sure one day someone will say it is so tiny they left it in a bag and forgot all about it) and its price point versus close competitors.

Leica M10-R, Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8

This lens is a keeper for what it can deliver in the M-mount ultra-compact pancake lenses category.

Also, there seems to be a 6% discount if you use the code KEITHWEE at Brightin Star shop here.

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimers:

  1. All product photos and samples here were photographed by me. I believe any reviewer with pride should produce their own product photos.

2. All images were shot with my personal set of the M10-R and a production copy of the Brightin Star XSlim-M 28mm ƒ2.8, and all DNG files were edited in LR CC Classic to my preferences. 

3. This review is not sponsored. The lens was sent by Brightin Star for review purposes.

4. I write as a passion and a hobby, and I appreciate that photography brands are kind enough to respect and work with me.

5. The best way to support me is to share the review, or you can always help support me by contributing to my fees to WordPress for the domain using the Paypal button at the bottom of the page.

15 Replies to “Brightin Star XSlim 28mm F2.8 review – a true pancake lens with character to match”

  1. Crispin's avatar

    Thank you for the review. It seems like a very nice lens. MS-Optical are nice too, but they are are often quirky to the point of being nice objects, but not lenses.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Keith Wee's avatar

      Hi Crispin, thank you. I think maybe one day I should get one of the MS-Optical pieces to try too. So far by friend’s words they seem really all over the place with consistency.

      Like

  2. Unknown's avatar

    Excellent and balanced sharing as usual Keith, will you be getting one yourself too?

    Like

    1. Keith Wee's avatar

      Hi Nich, thank you for the kind words. Yeap, I will be, afterall this lens is so compact it deserves to be just snuck in among my every day carry.

      Like

  3. Unknown's avatar

    Thanks , nice review I had the lens know its very compact and sharp in the middle in all apertures

    Like

  4. Unknown's avatar

    These sample photos are such that I want to make a purchase of this lens at once. I am curious about the optical structure of this lens, in other words, does it fall into the category of double gauss, planar, tessar, sonnar or whatever. thx

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Unknown's avatar

        Ahhh!!! Thank u soooo much!!! I actually asked them the other day, but no clear anwser was given 😦

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Unknown's avatar

    Hi, Keith!!! The other day, I came across a very cute kitty and took some shots of it with my FE 35 1.4ZA. It was dusk, so cars on the street had all switched on their headlights. But afterwards, when I looked at these pics, I noticed that the bokeh of which blurred headlights had formed in the background of the shots had taken on a peculiar texture, and later I figured out that these were “onion rings” produced by aspherical elements. Here goes my question: Have Keith noticed any “onion rings” in such scenarios with this little lens? Thank you so much!!!

    Like

    1. Keith Wee's avatar

      Hi! 🙂

      You are referring to the Distagon FE 35mm F1.4 ZA by Zeiss here, a lens I tested 4 years ago on the A7R3 and Yeap. I do see some onion rings in the bokeh balls, espeically those shot at night and Yeap, it’s likely due to aspherical element.

      For the BrightinStar, which actually can go a bit crazy in flaring (some call this character) I have not noticed this onion ring as much, but I wouldn’t say this is because it does not exist but more of because the bokeh balls formed from this lens are smaller in generally, making such structures much harder to spot.

      Like

      1. Unknown's avatar

        WOW!!! Your reply is soooo quick!!! A huge “like” button on that!!! I actually suspected that there might be a time difference between us hahaha. Yes, I had that ridiculously huge lens for a month or so before selling it to a friend based in Shanghai at a bargain price. Much as I enjoyed its built quality and color rendering, I had never considered that the bulk of the size could be a real problem for me, in addition to the grainy look of bokeh at certain scenes. This time, I’m going to lease a Sony FE 28mm F2 from a lens rental company to check if its weight will catch me off guard again:-( Meanwhile, I will keep looking for a used BS XSlim 28mm to adapt to my VM-E close focus adapter. I have to admit that your sample photos are more appealing to me than any other sites, as I can smell serenity and warmth in them! Thank you so much!

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Keith Wee's avatar

        Thank you 🙂 I’m hoping to enjoy my photography while not seeing the reviews as jobs since I don’t make money from them , and hence very glad to read your comments too.

        Like

Leave a comment