TTArtisan (铭匠光学), after releasing their first autofocus lens for Fujifilm X-mount, the TTArtisan 27mm ƒ2.8 (my review is here), is here again with a pleasant surprise in its yet latest release,
Announced on 25 November 2022, the TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 seeks to break new boundaries for Fujifilm X-mount. For Fujifilm native lenses, there are currently no lens of this spec with the closest in terms of maximum aperture size, the classic XF35mm ƒ1.4, and of course, the more modern XF33mm ƒ1.4 (my review here).
*on the APSC-sized Fujifilm X-mount sensor, a 35mm lens gives an equivalent view of 50mm at a 1.5x crop factor, hence the mention of the Noctilux in the title.
I was pleasantly surprised that TTArtisan has designed and built a lens of these specifications smaller than the already compact native XF35mm ƒ1.4. Let us take a closer look at the technical details before going into how it performs.
- name: TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95
- 52mm filter size, at approximately 247 to 267 grams (due to different mounts being made available)
- 7 elements in 5 groups, with a minimum focusing distance of 0.35m (1.148 feet)
- ƒ0.95 to ƒ16, with a 10 diaphragm blades design
- Fujifilm X-mount but only manual focus
Performance, Handling, and Samples
I have shot the USD12,995 Leica Noctilux, (not to flex), but I think it is important to consider the performance of the USD199 TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 in this perspective.
After testing the much-vaulted XF50mm ƒ1 (my review here), I have learned to understand that the toughest part of lens design in these super-fast lenses is whether the manufacturer can design them for optimum performance wide open. The XF50mm at ƒ1.0, for example, though exceedingly sharp, exhibited some chromatic aberration issues wide open, which I must emphasize here is perfectly expected for a lens that is so fast.
For example, even the USD12,995 Leica Noctilux, for all its superb performance and known for its superb balance between sharpness wide open and characteristic rendering, comes in with an onion-ring effect in its bokeh and underwhelming sharpness at close range, at a weight of close to 800 grams.
And in this perspective, it is then important to say the TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 is 1% the price of the Leica 50mm Noctilux and easily only approximately 33% of its weight, and we cannot run from the laws of physics in lens design.
The TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 handles very well, with its compact size and well designed aperture ring and good amount of focus throw.
Firstly, the TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 scores well on being ergonomically designed. The aperture ring clicks in a ‘clickly/crispy’ way, so one has a very good idea of the aperture value even without having to look at the lens, and the focusing throw for a manual lens is pretty decent, allowing room for more accurate focusing while not having to do wrist gymnastics to move from minimum focusing distance to infinity.
For those accustomed to manual focusing lenses, using the TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 on even the non-back LCD Fujifilm X-Pro3 will be easy, though it takes practice and patience. The more updated and larger EVFs on the X-H2, X-H2S, and X-T5 make this process even easier.
A quick reminder that manual focusing assist modes on Fujifilm X-mount cameras are pretty useful even with the X-Pro3. I use the standard ‘magnification’ option.No, I do not use the Digital split image mode as I find it too gimmicky.
Using the TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 for street photography was nifty, with its size providing a good balance even on my X-Pro3. A plus was that TTArtisan has done a good job of making the distance and aperture markings visible (etched in and not painted over like some other cheap lenses) for focusing work. I generally work around ƒ2 to ƒ4 on Fujifilm X-mount for street photography.
But, what about photographs at F0.95?
For that, let us look at a series of samples at various apertures.
For the TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95, I can honestly say that at ƒ0.95, the image is decently sharp at the center, mostly due to a ‘glow’ effect one can see around the edges of the subject, which is likely due to spherical aberration.
My preference is stepping the lens down to ƒ1.4 onwards, where the center gets significant improvements in sharpness, and images provide a very good amount of ‘bokeh’ and pop.
I prefer going from ƒ1.4 onwards on this lens, while I am sure some users will be keen on the rendering at ƒ0.95.
Interestingly, the lens performance vignetting-wise is much better than I expected. In fact, the TTArtisan 27mm ƒ2.8 had more vignetting wide open at ƒ2.8 versus this lens at ƒ0.95 and I do recall that the Mitakon 35mm ƒ0.95 II for X-mount having more vignetting too.
A conversation with a fellow reviewer today was third-party makers should go where the native lenses don’t. In this case, TTArtisan has delivered with its 35mm ƒ0.95, whereas Fujifilm has thrown in the towel with its supposed XF33mm ƒ1 (which became the XF50mm ƒ1 in the end) (yes, I understand I am comparing autofocus with manual focus here).
What about potential competitors in the 35mm ƒ0.95 manual focusing arena for X-mount?
Before the TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95, Mitakon and 7Artisan had already released a 35mm ƒ0.95 for Fujifilm X-mount. Still, from the samples I have seen online, Mitakon and 7Artisan are pretty close optically, and all three have their own strengths and weaknesses (what some will label as lens character), with the Mitakon being pretty wild in flaring and sporting a clickless aperture ring.
That said, to each his/her own, and I am again sure some will like the signatures of one of these over the others in their own ways, and frankly, these lenses will still give extraordinary output in the right hands.
While the TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 is not a lens I will be using wide open frequently, it performs very well from ƒ1.4 onwards with a lot to like about the lens, including its quality all-metal build (even its lens cap is made from metal, versus the plastic hoods and lens caps Fujifilm has been including), its well-designed ergonomics and most of all, image quality down to its quality of bokeh which is actually pretty classical in its render.
Some detractors may say manual focusing lenses, and well, third-party lenses are not for serious work, and in this case, I beg to differ; in fact, I was using this exact lens for a review with the just launched Polaroid P2 (review here).
The TTArtisan 35mm ƒ0.95 is a lens I will use when I want to have a bit of fun with manual focusing and performs optically admirably for its cost with a very good quality build to boot and is a lens I will purchase too.
TTArtisan is a brand doing pretty well with its releases, and I look forward to seeing its future releases for both Leica M mount and Fujifilm X-mount.
Thank you for reading.
- This is not a paid review, and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 is my personal set running ver 1.31.
- All product photos and samples shared were photographed by me. I believe any reviewer with pride should produce their own product photos.
- I do not do affiliate purchase links to keep me neutral. I write as a passion and a hobby, and I appreciate that photography brands are kind enough to respect and work with me.
- The best way to support me is to share the review, or you can always help support me by contributing to my fees to WordPress using the ‘Buy me a Coffee’ button at the bottom of the page. Every little bit goes a long way.
8 Replies to “TTArtisan 35mm F0.95 review – is this ‘the’ Noctilux for Fujifilm X-mount?”
Excellent review! Is this for sale yet? Will be great to see how the 7Artisan compares.
Hi Kait, thank you. The lens will be on sale later today on TTArtisan’s site I guess. The price should be USD199. Let’s see if I can get my hands on the 7Artisan and compare.
Keith, I would expect such a lens to show vignetting at its widest aperture. Though , this remains an option for those looking for pale imitations with a lower entry point as regards the cost. I haven’t seen many reviews centred on Zeiss optics from you. I would be remiss if I didn’t draw your attention to a lens I’m using at the moment. The Zeiss Distagon ZM 35mm F1.4. I find it considerably better than the 35mm Summilux FLE i was using previously. I won’t heap more praise on it. For the sheer variety of gear you face , I’m sure you would have a lens which would be the equivalent of a holy grail.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi again my friend! I’m sure I have heard you mention the Zeiss Distagon 35/1.4 and I’ve used the Sony version and it was really a very very excellent lens. Let me sift around for a Zeiss 35/1.4 for M mount
The large variance in lens weight in the spec is from differences in mount formats. They make the same lens for E-Mount, X-Mount, M43 etc. and the mounts all weigh in different. Although I haven’t been able to find exact numbers for how much each mount weighs.
Hi Ciel, thank you for sharing this very logical point that I didn’t think about haha.